![]() In our video transcoding test, which involves transcoding a one-hour-long 1080p video, the M2 MacBook Pro took a little over 16 minutes, which is a remarkable 16% improvement over the M1 MacBook Pro and 23% faster than a PC notebook with the Core i7-1260P. However, it’s still quite a long way off from a M1 Max 14-inch MacBook Pro and a M1 Ultra Mac Studio. However, that advantage was lost on Cinebench, where it’s multi-core scores trailed not only the M2 MacBook Pro but also the older M1 MacBook Pro. Though the M2 has a definite advantage in single-core performance, the Core i7-1260P managed higher multi-core scores on Geekbench. What’s interesting also is how the M2 MacBook Pro performed against a PC notebook that’s powered by Intel’s new Core i7-1260P Alder Lake processor. Still, the higher single-core scores suggest that M2 is indeed capable of executing greater instructions per cycle. Single-core score was up by 7% and multi-core score increased by 5%. The improvements on Cinebench were less dramatic. And on WebXPRT 3, the M2 MacBook Pro’s score was 20% better. On Geekbench 5, t he M2 MacBook Pro’s single and multi-core scores were 9% and 20% better respectively. There’s evidence to suggest that Apple’s claims of up to 18% multi-threaded performance is right. ![]() If you configure a similar system, it will set you back S$2,779. ![]() To start, the updated 13-inch MacBook Pro that I'm testing is a custom-configured model with 16GB of memory and a 1TB SSD. Performance analysis CPU performance analysis ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |